The most bought .... and prayed to statute is of —
The most prayed to statue.
Mary showing her "Sacred Heart" and because of it God chose her to have his Jesus "above all other women."
Can you believe this. This … is the result of idol worshiping.
Former Presidential runner Romney wears it! See the outline of his underwear under his white shirt.
These underwear garments are considered so sacred. They contain small symbols. This underwear is worn by faithful adult Mormons who’ve received certain ordinances in one of the church’s temples (which are different from the churches Mormons attend on Sundays).
By putting on what Mormons call “the whole armor of God” they believe that they are protected from temptation. There are common stories of people who believe they were protected from physical injury because they wore this underwear.
Elder Carlos E. Asay, a high-ranking church official, explained the garment like this: “It is given to remind wearers of the continuing need for repentance, the need to honor binding covenants made in the house of the Lord, and the need to cherish and share virtue in our daily living so that promised blessings may be claimed.”
Notice how Jesus covers his groin. How appropriate.
The image was found to have paint particles.
Carbon 14 dating placed the cloth being from the 14th century.
This shroud contradicts the New Testament Gospel accounts of way Jesus is described to be wrapped with multiple cloths and a napkin placed over his face.
The iconic Shroud of Turin is a 14-foot linen cloth bearing front & back images of a severely beaten and crucified man who stood 5' 10" (tall for that era). It is believed by the faithful to be the actual burial shroud of Jesus Christ. In the West, it was first presented to a local church during the 1350s by a French knight. There is no record of where the shroud was during the 1300 years since Christ’s burial outside Jerusalem -- though the best theory (based on forensic analysis of pollen particles from the shroud) would be that it was kept in Constantinople until the Catholic army's "4th Crusade" sack of the Eastern Orthodox city -- and before that, located in Jerusalem.
Worried that the shroud could turn out to be fake, the official position of Pope Clement VII and the Catholic Church at that time was to declare it to be an artistic relic, but not a holy icon -- a fact which debunkers will often cite, but which fails to take into account the fact no one then, nor to this day, has been able to explain how the haunting image and blood stains got into the fabric.
In 1532, a fire broke out (or was set?) in the chapel where the shroud had been moved to. It melted part of the silver in the container housing the shroud -- dripping molten metal on the sides of the cloth. Some of the damaged area was replaced and stitched together by nuns, but the burn marks and the extinguishing water stains remain visible on the shroud today.
In 1578, the shroud was again moved -- to the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in the city of Turin -- which later became part of Italy. It has remained there ever since, with the exception of World War II, when it was relocated to protect it from American bombardment. There was another fire in 1997 which required the shroud to be saved (Satanic arson, I bet).
Going on seven centuries now, the debate about its authenticity continues -- especially since an accidental discovery in 1898. That year, an Italian photographer was shocked to discover that the negative image of the shroud yielded a much clearer positive (possibly indicating that the original image itself is the photographic negative). Ever since, both deniers and believers have sought to bolster their arguments with intensive scientific studies utilizing forensic technologies not available in centuries gone by.
 |  |
In 2019, it required a lawsuit and a court-order for a team of secular Oxford scientists to finally access the original 1988 data compiled by an earlier team of scientists whose work led to the publication of a much-publicized "debunking" article in the journal, Nature. After the British Museum was forced to release the data, the Oxford team scientifically ruled out the 1988 findings.
The carbon-dating "debunk" of 1988 turned out to be hasty (if not rigged) conclusion based on contaminated and repaired (from the 1592 fire) samples of the cloth. We have learned of many cases of erroneous carbon-dating -- such as a known 1000-year old Viking artifact dating back only to the 1980s.
 |  A hero smashed the thick encasement as fire burned all around him. |  |
 NY TIMES / 1997  |  |
Christ, who escaped the crucifixion, went through the ups and downs of travel, and again came to Japan. He settled right here in what is now called Herai Village, and died at the age of 106. On this holy ground, there is dedicated a burial mound on the right to deity Christ, and a grave on the left to deity his brother Isukiri.
The Jesus linage lives on. Jesus married a Japanese woman and fathered three daughters.
Jesus Christ did not die on the cross at Golgotha. Instead his brother, Isukiri was his place on the cross (by mistake), while Jesus fled across Siberia to Mutsu Province, in northern Japan. Once in Japan, he became a rice farmer, married, and raised a family with three daughters near what is now Shingō. While in Japan, it is asserted that he traveled, learned, and eventually died at the age of 106. His body was exposed on a hilltop for four years. According to the customs of the time, Jesus’ bones were collected, bundled, and buried in the mound purported to be the grave of Jesus Christ.
Rozabal ... India to be exact.
One big dummy converting from one stupid fantasy to another stupid fantasy.
Lyon Basilica – Lyon, France
Only idol worshiping Christians could come up with this one; automatic guilt.
The first indication of such a concept as “Original Sin” was in the 2nd century by Irenaeus, from the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Lyon, in France.
The Christians claim that Adam is accountable as having brought death into the world by eating the forbidden fruit. Thus all of his offspring are responsible for his wrong doing.
The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. Ez 18:20
And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more everything living, as I have done. Genesis 8:21
And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. Genesis 6:5-8,
The Bible states that God recognizes that man inherently has evil imaginations. However it is clear that Adam’s sins are his alone.
And where does it say that Adam brought about death? It says it In the Christian New Testament of course. I guess all the dinosaurs didn’t die. And i guess all the animal also inherited death from Adam also.
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: Romans 5:12
I can see the writer was no Jack London (the Greek gospel writer Paul of course).
Right after that verse Paul states,
for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. Romans 5:13
The Christians have to call it the “word of God” otherwise people will start thinking about what the text says.
God cursed the ground, and Adam was to struggle in his labors because the ground was cursed.
To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’
“Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.
18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field.
19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.” Genesis :17-19
And where does it say that Adam brought about death? In the Christian New Testament they claim death wasn’t around until Adam sinned (ate the fruit). I guess only the animals died and not man???
The Talmud is clear that the this cursing of the ground was later lifted.
Christians don’t want to read and think. They just want to “believe” in whatever a preacher imagines (evil imaginings).
This is a perfect example of the effect of how idol worshipers will be so gullible and believe anything they hear. They want it to be true to satisfy their illusions of grandeur. Someone says this 666 is the word of God. Then everyone says “I believe it.” Now they are the knowing ones and their egos are satisfied because now they are special having learned special knowledge. They have learned illusion.
It might help if they were to look at the original Greek text. It doesn’t say 666. Some say it says 616 as in the Novum Testamentum Graece, Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus, and others. It doesn’t say 616.
Google bible 666 and see all the ridiculous explanations
Look in the Codex Vaticanus. They are not Greek words at all. They are symbols. They are in Arabic. Any Arab knows what they mean.
The first symbol symbolizes the concept “bisim,” which means “in the word of.”
The second symbol is the symbol of “Allah,” (as in – There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger).
The third symbol looks similar to an X which symbolizes “Islam.” It today is the bottom part of the symbol of Saudi Arabia. It is also on the flag of Saudi Arabia. It has been the symbol of Islam since it began.
That is not a Palm Tree. That is not the rising Sun. That is blood from the infidels.
The Arabic components that build-up the word “Allah”:
1. alif
2. hamzat waṣl (همزة وصل)
3. lām
4. lām
5. shadda (شدة)
6. dagger alif (ألف خنجرية)
7. hāʾ
Do you judge a person by what they say, or by what they do? The Born Again Christians claim they are so different from the Catholics. They say the Catholics are bad but they the “born again” are so good. Let’s compare.
Worship on Sunday instead of Saturday? Jesus and even Paul worshiped on Saturday. Check your New Testament. When the Catholic Church changed the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday, the Christians followed and also changed their day of worship from Saturday to Sunday. This is a tacit recognition of the absolute authority of Rome and the Catholics because they observe the “Sunday Sabbath” that was ordered by the Pope in the Council of Laodicea (A.D. 364). Most Christian don’t know that Mirthras is the Sun God worshiped by the majority of pagans at that time (and they worshiped on Sunday). The Christians also don’t know what day of the year is the birthday of Mirthras.
The “word of God” texts were decreed (canonized) by the Catholics. Writings claimed to have been written by the original apostles were deliberately left out. Once Catholics said this is the “Word of God”, all the Born Again Christians say “wow …. God wrote those words …….., those Catholics know what truth is. I’m going to follow those people from now on.” And the Born Again Christians (more like born yesterday again and again) and Protestant Christians are mere sheep and accept the authority and decrees of the Catholic Church without question (as to what books comprise the “Word of God”, that worship should be on Sunday instead of Saturday, that Jesus was God in the flesh, etc. etc.).
When the Catholic Church established the doctrine that there were three persons in one God, The Born Again Christians followed without question. There was no such doctrine before the Catholic Church started explaining it.
The Catholics have statutes in their churches which the Born Again Christians say are idols, yet the Christians have crosses in their churches. They rarely have an image of Jesus’s body hanging on it, but a plane cross becomes an idol symbol when the Christians also claim that Jesus was god in the flesh.
The Born Again Christians once again heartily follow the Catholics in their claim that the Old Testament is no longer valid and that the New Testament has replaced it.
When the Catholics declared the day of Jesus’s birth to be December 25, the Born Again Christians respected the Catholics as having the authority to set the day and have honored that day since the Catholic’s decree to the present, just as all the Catholics honor it. The birthday of Mirthas the sun god is December 25.
When the Catholic Church declared the date of Good Friday and the date honoring the resurrection of Jesus, the Born Again Christians also honored both dates that were set (even though it’s not three days). The Catholic Church named the resurrection holiday Easter honoring the pagan god Ishtar. The Born Again Christians didn’t blink an eye and also readily accepted the name the Catholics established for that day.
When the Catholic Church declared the day to honor all the saints, the Born Again Christians acknowledged it by celebrating all hallows eve, also known today as Halloween.
The Catholics glorify the virgin birth of Jesus. The Born Again Christians totally accept the Catholic precept and agree that Jesus was born of a virgin. Of course there are about 8 or more other pagan religions before Jesus that also claimed their leader were born of a virgin.
The Catholics say the holy days decreed to be followed in the Old Testament are no longer valid. The Born Again Christians again follow the Catholics and don’t celebrate those holidays.
The Born Again Christians say the “Blood” of Jesus stopped that practice (What does his “Blood” have anything to do with it?). He was not a temple sacrifice killed by Cohen priests in the temple. Christians saying this are insulting Jesus and what he practiced. These insulting people are just furthering their desire for idol worship. Jesus was murdered by the Romans who saw him as leading a revolt and killing him would send a message to the people. And the Romans were certainly not following any orders from the high priests.
Many of the Christian priests or preachers dress similar to the catholic priests with the white linen robe and a colored cover vestment over it. Also, many Born Again Christian priests wear a white collar and dress in black exactly like the Catholic priests. Funny thing is, even Anton LaVey author of the satanic bible even wore a white collar at one time.
When a person believes in and performs all of the decrees of an organization they are considered to be a member even though they haven’t formally joined (called de jure in law). The Catholic Church considers anyone who follows their precepts to be Catholic and not a heretic.
Now I ask again, do you judge someone by what they say or by what they do?
The Vatican prelature known as Opus Dei is a deeply devout and secret Catholic sect that is composed of lay persons of the working world. They are under the personal protection of the Pope. The members do not answer to the Bishops of the Diocese in which they live.
Opus Dei is Latin and means “the work of God.”
The organization was founded by a Spanish Priest named Josemaria Escriva in the 1930’s, He moved to Rome to better influence the Pope.
Self flagellation is practiced and encouraged. Escriva wrote in his guidebook The Way, “Where there is no mortification there is no virtue.” (The Way, #180). He further wrote, “Unless you mortify yourself, you will never be a prayful soul.” (The Way #172). The bathroom walls of the founder Escriva were covered in speckles of blood from his daily flagellation.
Members are expected to wear a “cilice” for two hours a day, minimum. They are also expected to beat themselves on the back and the buttocks once a week, minimum.
Opus Dei does not see this as a punishment to quench the desires of the body, but as a way to share the physical suffering of Christ. If a member feels they need to attone their sins, then extra penance through additional mortification is needed.
Opus Dei is as powerful as ever and has just completed construction of a $47 million World Headquarters at 243 Lexington Avenue in New York City.
Men only entrance.
All Raptured except DAD
Prior to 1830 there was NO SUCH DOCTRINE!!! John Nelson Darby invented the “rapture.” Darby notes that the doctrine just “popped into his head” in 1830 AD. Before this, no one had ever heard of a secret rapture doctrine. Darby’s pre-tribulational view of the rapture was then picked up by a man named C.I. Scofield, who taught the view in the footnotes of his Scofield Reference Bible, which was widely distributed in England and America. Many Protestants who read the Scofield Reference Bible uncritically accepted what its footnotes said and adopted the “rapture” doctrine, even though no Christian had heard of it in the previous 1800 years of Church history.” The essence of the case offered by Darby, Scofield and their modern counterparts is based upon the English translation of “caught up.”
1 Thessalonians 4:17 17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
1 Cor. 15:51-52, 51 “Behold, I tell you a mystery; we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed.”
Sounds more like the end of all human existence. Such pre-tribulation rapture fantasy could only be imagined as real by a dedicated idol worshiping nation.
Dog not raptured
crashing cars
